Our Location
Manufacturing applications depend significantly on the quality of their finished parts to ensure that the final product performs optimally. A crucial aspect of this quality is the surface finish, which refers to the texture of the surface produced during manufacturing processes. Among the various factors affecting this quality, surface roughness is particularly critical, as it significantly impacts the functionality and lifespan of manufactured items.
Whether you work in CNC machining, precision stamping services, or sheet metal fabrication, understanding the importance of surface finish is crucial. It impacts not only the mechanical performance and longevity of components but also affects factors such as friction, wear rate, noise generation, and the ability to retain lubricants.
Even the aesthetic appeal, increasingly important in consumer industries, is determined by surface finish. A poorly finished component may function as expected, but if it looks inadequate, the customer may reject it.
The Surface Roughness Chart is a valued tool for engineers and manufacturers, designed to help them understand the different levels of surface finish in machining and manufacturing processes. This chart serves as a visual guide, displaying various surface finishes along with their corresponding notations and surface roughness values.

Table of Contents
ToggleBefore we delve into the surface finish chart, let’s first understand what surface finish details are. Surface finish means the process of altering a metal’s surface, which involves removing, adding to, or reshaping it to achieve a desired appearance. Surface texture is used to describe a product’s complete surface profile, defined by its waviness, roughness, and lay.
The surface roughness is the measure of the whole spaced irregularities on the surface. When machinists discuss “surface finish,” they typically refer to surface roughness.
Waviness refers to a surface with a spacing greater than that of the surface roughness length. Lay refers to the direction in which the predominant surface pattern lies. Machinists often decide to lay out the methods used for the surface.

Surface roughness is a crucial factor in understanding how a product interacts with its environment. The finish of a product can significantly impact its performance, and variations in roughness can influence its overall effectiveness.
For this reason, engineers and manufacturers must closely monitor surface finishes to ensure optimal performance. This practice ensures consistent processes and the production of reliable products. Furthermore, measuring surface roughness is essential for maintaining control over manufacturing processes, which is particularly valuable in the field of surface engineering.
Different surface finishes produce varied effects. The simplest way to achieve the desired finish is by comparing it to surface finish standards. Various surface finishes can provide several benefits:
Evaluating surface roughness requires an approach tailored to each situation. Various methods exist, each offering distinct benefits and drawbacks. A clear understanding of these techniques can help in choosing the most appropriate one for a given application.

Surface finish symbols, also known as surface texture symbols, convey various aspects of surface quality, including roughness, waviness, and lay. These symbols appear on engineering drawings and are used in machining processes to specify the required level of surface finish for a particular component or surface.
For example, a ‘C’ with a line through it represents a specified surface roughness, while ‘Ra’ denotes the average roughness. Other abbreviations, such as ‘N’ and ‘Rmax,’ indicate maximum roughness, while ‘Rz’ stands for the average maximum profile height. Additionally, a checkered pattern symbolizes a surface that requires grinding.
In the field of surface roughness, the abbreviations’ Ra’, ‘Rz’, and ‘Rmax’ are among the most commonly used.
Ra, or Average Surface Roughness, is defined as the arithmetic average of its absolute values of surface height deviations from the mean line, measured over one sampling length.
Rz, or Average Maximum Profile Height, is defined as the average of the 5 highest peaks and the five deepest valleys measured over the length of the assessment.
Finally, Rmax, or Peak-to-Valley Height, indicates the maximum vertical distance between the lowest valley and the highest peak in a surface profile within one sampling length.
Here is a well-organized surface roughness comparison chart that will help you assess various roughness scales, such as Ra, Rz, and RMS, across multiple manufacturing standards and procedures. Let’s familiarize ourselves with some of the abbreviations you may encounter in the conversion chart as we explore it:
Ra: Roughness Average
Rt: Roughness Total
CLA: Center Line Average
RMS: Root Mean Square
N: New ISO (Grade) Scale Numbers
Cut-Off Length: Length Required for Sample
Here is a table you can use as a guide to compare different roughness scales:
| Ramicrometers (µm) | Ramicro inches(µin) | RMSmicro inches (µin) | CLA (µin) | Rt microns | Cut-off Length (in) | mm | N Grade |
| 0.025 | 1 | 1.1 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.003 | 0.08 | 1 |
| 0.05 | 2 | 2.2 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.01 | 0.25 | 2 |
| 0.1 | 4 | 4.4 | 4 | 0.8 | 0.01 | 0.25 | 3 |
| 0.2 | 8 | 8.8 | 8 | 1.2 | 0.01 | 0.25 | 4 |
| 0.4 | 16 | 17.6 | 16 | 2 | 0.01 | 0.25 | 5 |
| 0.8 | 32 | 32.5 | 32 | 4 | 0.03 | 0.8 | 6 |
| 1.6 | 63 | 64.3 | 63 | 8 | 0.03 | 0.8 | 7 |
| 3.2 | 125 | 137.5 | 125 | 13 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 8 |
| 6.3 | 250 | 275 | 250 | 25 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 9 |
| 12.5 | 500 | 550 | 500 | 50 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 10 |
| 25 | 1000 | 1100 | 1000 | 100 | 0.3 | 8 | 11 |
| 50 | 2000 | 2200 | 2000 | 200 | 0.3 | 8 | 12 |
In this section, we will examine the surface finish cheat sheet, which serves as a valuable resource for gaining insight into the various surface finishes available.
| Micrometer (µm) Rating | Micro inches (µin) rating | Applications |
| 25 | 1000 | Extremely coarse, low-grade surfaces produced from rough forging or saw cutting. It is the best finish option for machined clearance areas. |
| 12.5 | 500 | Coarse, low-grade surface finish resulting from heavy cuts and coarse feeds. It is best for rough stock or unfinished workpieces. |
| 6.3 | 250 | Coarse machine finish from disc grinds, surface grinds, drilling, or milling. Hence, it is suitable for clearance surfaces with design permits and stress requirements. |
| 3.2 | 125 | Noticeably rough finishes are best for parts working in environments with high stress, load,s and vibrations. |
| 1.6 | 63 | Average machining finish produced under controlled parameters. It involves relatively high speeds and moderate feeds. |
| 0.8 | 32 | A top-notch machine finish that requires close control. It is easy to achieve with surface, cylindrical, and centerless grinders. |
| 0.4 | 16 | Fine surface finish with slight texture achieved with emery buffing, coarse honing, or lapping. These finishes are ideal options for situations where smoothness is non-negotiable. |
| 0.2 | 8 | A smooth, top-quality surface finish achieved using honing, lapping, or buffing. Manufacturers use this for packings and rings that will slide across the surface grain. |
| 0.1 | 4 | A very fine and refined surface produced with the finest lapping, honing. Or buffing. Engineers often employ it in cases where it is a mandatory design requirement. Thus, this finish is best for gauge and instrument work. |
| 0.05 | 21 | Flawless mirror-like surface finish achieved with the finest honing, buffing, or super finishing. These surface roughness values are ideal for sensitive precision gauge blocks. |
| 0.025 |
This reference chart allows for easy comparison of surface roughness grades, detailing their typical finish descriptions and real-world applications. It serves as a practical tool for engineers, machinists, and designers to select the appropriate finish for both functionality and appearance.
| Ra (µm) | Ra (µin) | Surface Description | Common Applications |
| 0.025 | 1 | Super mirror finish | Optical lenses, aerospace seals |
| 0.05 | 2 | Mirror-like finish | Precision sealing, medical tools |
| 0.1 | 4 | Very fine finish | High-end bearing surfaces |
| 0.2 | 8 | Fine ground finish | Hydraulic systems, polished dies |
| 0.4 | 16 | Smooth machined finish | Shafts, gears, and press fits |
| 0.8 | 32 | General machining | Standard mechanical parts |
| 1.6 | 63 | Typical machining finish | Brackets, casings, and non-critical components |
| 3.2 | 125 | Rough turning/milling | Structural parts, basic prototypes |
| 6.3 | 250 | Very rough machined surface | Forgings, low-tolerance parts |
| 12.5 | 500 | Rough as-cast finish | Cast parts, unfinished surfaces |
Machining surface finishes are influenced by several factors: the cutting tool, feed rate, depth of cut, cutting speed, and the material being machined. Each of these primary elements plays a significant role:
Coolants enhance the surface finish and extend the life of tools used in the machining process. They also help reduce friction during the operation. Roughness is caused by the heat produced in CNC machining.
Using higher-pressure coolant can improve the surface finish of a workpiece, but it is not always the most efficient option. In some cases, utilizing a lower-quality coolant that the machine can accommodate can be advantageous. This method can reduce surface roughness and is more cost-effective. Additionally, it helps decrease pollution and can extend the lifespan of the cutting tools.
The machining process significantly affects surface roughness, with two primary parameters playing a key role: feed rate and cutting speed. In CNC turning, both of these parameters impact the surface finish. Specifically, an increase in feed rate tends to result in a substantial rise in surface roughness, while higher cutting speeds usually lead to improved finishes.
Cutting parameters play a vital role in achieving the desired surface finish. These parameters include the feed rate, depth of cut, and cutting speed.
It has been observed that enhancing the cutting speed generally reduces surface roughness. Conversely, increasing the depth of cut tends to increase the maximum roughness value. Additionally, a higher feed rate usually results in a decrease in average roughness.
Moreover, the application of cutting fluids can significantly improve surface finish and reduce surface roughness. Cutting fluids help to lower the temperature of the tool and the contact surface during cutting. Additionally, fluid penetration minimizes the interaction between the tool and the workpiece, further enhancing the surface finish.
Consequently, vibrations from both worn and unworn tools can crucially affect the surface finish of a workpiece. Worn tools tend to remove material in a way that creates irregularities in surface roughness.
The frequency and amplitude of the vibrations influence the quality of the surface on vibrating parts. As the amplitude of a sine wave increases, the average roughness of the surface also increases. However, variations in vibration frequency have minimal impact on the overall smoothness of the surface.
Together, these factors determine the final surface finish of the workpiece. Therefore, it is essential to understand their impact to enhance performance.
The guide gives you a comprehensive understanding of the techniques, applications, and standards that shape modern businesses in the complex world of surface roughness. With this knowledge, you can enhance your skills in engineering, design, and manufacturing, ranging from interpreting charts to measuring methods. In today’s diverse landscape, surface roughness charts are essential for ensuring accuracy, consistency, and optimal performance across various applications. This guide simplifies the complexities of these charts, making them easier to understand and apply.
